There could be the following: 1v2/ 1v3/ 1v4/ 1v5 2v3/ 2v2v2/ 2v4/ 2v1v1/ 2v2v1 3v1v1v1/ 3v2v1/ 3v1v1 4v1v1 Some times there are low levels (that would make up the massive teams) and 1 or 2 high levels (the tiny teams, making normal team games unbalanced
I think if there was to be live 1v2, 1v3 etc. They player faceing 2 or 3 people should have to agree to facing them and get a bonus for it. I do like the idea of like 2v2v2 though, it could be called multi-team.
I think Antony means that there should be 1v2 or 1v3 where they all have equal hp that way 3 low levels can go against a level 50 and have a chance of winning. I think the higher level should get a bonus though for winning.
Well, most lower levels can't aim. I think if a higher level wants the challenge for more xp, then they should be able to do it.
Some low levels are not "noobs" actually. They were lvl 40s in ss1, so are actually pretty experienced, and can match up to a lvl 50..
I am not saying the level 50 will always win, but if they want the challenge I think it would be nice.
Yup I completely agree, and new modes would be great. I hope to seem some soon. I like 1 v 2/ 1 v 3. I also like 2 v 2 v 2.
The issue would be having to decide who goes where, like a person with 1000 HP vs 5 people with 200 HP.
I think in 1v2 and 1v3 everyone should have the same hp and if they person on the one man team wins, they get a bonus. For 1v5 I think the person on the one man team should have about double hp and maybe still get a bonus.
Not bad of an idea here. This could be useful. And I had this one idea called Team Survival where all of you start off in the middle of the map with 300 HP (and your armor) and computer controlled enemy tanks come from the side of the map and you must defeat as many as you can. Of course, there are options to control the difficulty, such as how good they aim, what weapons they have, how often they start coming, and they either have 50HP, 100HP, or 150HP. But to prevent this from being abused for xp, lower difficulties don't give as much as higher difficulties. And with that, this mode could have an exclusive weapon that if you shoot it at an enemy, it will damage them like usual, but hit a teammate and it gives them some HP.
HP would be the same; in 6 player ffa games, I usually, almost completely, kill 2-4 tanks, due to possesion of super-weapons and luck/ skill. More players vs the tiny team result in more XP for the tiny team, and less for the massive team. 1v5 would be so tricky, but some noobs hit their teammates anyway. Also in 1v1 the better player get more than 2x score, so it seems more fair to have different sized teams, for example 1v1v4 would be: the 1's would be level 40- 50, an.d the 4 would be levels 1-30
Seems like a good idea, but is the host choosing the teams or the players? Wow thanks everyone for those likes, now I'm an Active Member
People choose their own teams, like in normal games, or the game would choose the teams if they had "?" for their team. Smaller teams have lower numbers, for example a team of 1 in a 1v2v3 would be team 1, the team of 2 would be team 2, team of 3 would be team 3.
