I often go into a lot of rooms where I find the host is dead with another player so the game hasn't begun. But all other players have. Say for example, it's a 3 v 3. In such games, the host and another player would be dead leaving 4 active players. How about, the other players be given an option to vote-kick the host. The other (non-active) player can then be kicked by the newly appointed host. Maybe a time limit of 20 or so additional seconds be given but if the host still doesn't show up, then it's he eats the boot. Whatsay?
That is a good idea, but I have a feeling some people would abuse it by voting to kick the host even if he was there and not not responding. For example if he won, low levels got angry, so they decide to kick him for no apparent reason. But I am sure they could make it so you can only vote if the host is not responding. Overall, it is a great idea.
It would be nice if the Host had a little more say "Then just a vote", if you know what I mean. Like a Moderator of his own room, except less then, you know, the powers of an actual Mod.
i think this is stupid. if a host makes a game they cant just be kicked from THEIR game. its unfair. if you want the person to leave just make your own lobby.
There's a good side to this. I think the good will outweigh the bad, now don't you think? 5 people agree.
